<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Annoying statics in php</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elizabethmariesmith.com/2006/01/annoying-statics-in-php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elizabethmariesmith.com/2006/01/annoying-statics-in-php/</link>
	<description>Night is darkest just before the dawn...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Building a culture of objects in PHP &#171; Resistance is futile</title>
		<link>http://elizabethmariesmith.com/2006/01/annoying-statics-in-php/comment-page-1/#comment-42370</link>
		<dc:creator>Building a culture of objects in PHP &#171; Resistance is futile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethmariesmith.com/2006/01/09/annoying-statics-in-php/#comment-42370</guid>
		<description>[...] Elizabeth Marie Smith does too and adds: I find it rather annoying that they haven’t fixed the problem BEFORE now - after all, the bugs (marked bogus or wont fix because obviously the zend guys weren’t using php5 at that point if they didn’t see the problem until zend framework came along) the bugs/requests have been around for a LONG TIME [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Elizabeth Marie Smith does too and adds: I find it rather annoying that they haven’t fixed the problem BEFORE now &#8211; after all, the bugs (marked bogus or wont fix because obviously the zend guys weren’t using php5 at that point if they didn’t see the problem until zend framework came along) the bugs/requests have been around for a LONG TIME [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramblinations</title>
		<link>http://elizabethmariesmith.com/2006/01/annoying-statics-in-php/comment-page-1/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>ramblinations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethmariesmith.com/2006/01/09/annoying-statics-in-php/#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;php singles bar limited to one generation only,...&lt;/strong&gt;

see, i thought it was just me. i thought, well, gemma, you probably shouldn&#039;t be trying to inherit from base singletons anyway. you&#039;re not really a programmer, what do you know? go play with bash, you&#039;ll feel better. (incidentally, i did it anyway a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>php singles bar limited to one generation only,&#8230;</strong>see, i thought it was just me. i thought, well, gemma, you probably shouldn&#8217;t be trying to inherit from base singletons anyway. you&#8217;re not really a programmer, what do you know? go play with bash, you&#8217;ll feel better. (incidentally, i did it anyway a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hodge</title>
		<link>http://elizabethmariesmith.com/2006/01/annoying-statics-in-php/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 06:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethmariesmith.com/2006/01/09/annoying-statics-in-php/#comment-589</guid>
		<description>Several months ago I filed my own slightly different feature request to solve the same issue using magic constants - I am hoping that the idea of adding extra magic constants is more appealing to the developers than adding a new keyword to the parser and they won&#039;t shrug it off.  You may wish to stop by and add a vote or comment: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=34804.

regards,
Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several months ago I filed my own slightly different feature request to solve the same issue using magic constants &#8211; I am hoping that the idea of adding extra magic constants is more appealing to the developers than adding a new keyword to the parser and they won&#8217;t shrug it off.  You may wish to stop by and add a vote or comment: <a href="http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=34804" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=34804</a>.</p>
<p>regards,<br />
Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Building a culture of objects in PHP &#124; Professional PHP</title>
		<link>http://elizabethmariesmith.com/2006/01/annoying-statics-in-php/comment-page-1/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Building a culture of objects in PHP &#124; Professional PHP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethmariesmith.com/2006/01/09/annoying-statics-in-php/#comment-577</guid>
		<description>[...] Elizabeth Marie Smith does too and adds:  I find it rather annoying that they haven’t fixed the problem BEFORE now - after all, the bugs (marked bogus or wont fix because obviously the zend guys weren’t using php5 at that point if they didn’t see the problem until zend framework came along) the bugs/requests have been around for a LONG TIME [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Elizabeth Marie Smith does too and adds:  I find it rather annoying that they haven’t fixed the problem BEFORE now &#8211; after all, the bugs (marked bogus or wont fix because obviously the zend guys weren’t using php5 at that point if they didn’t see the problem until zend framework came along) the bugs/requests have been around for a LONG TIME [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
